28 February 07 - 07:07How Open Is Open
In a stultifyingly repetition of the annual question Nat asks "How Open is Open Source Really"". Always an amusing question. (more)
- Open Source - two comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
This is the archive page for Connexitor Blog. Click to go to the frontpage of this site.
| « | July 2008 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2006
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2006
01 May - 31 May 2006
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2006
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2006
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2006
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2006
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2007
In a stultifyingly repetition of the annual question Nat asks "How Open is Open Source Really"". Always an amusing question. (more)
- Open Source - two comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
This posting points to an article and a patent (6,131,120) (link to full text) that seems to have claimed extending directories to "the management and control of enterprise networks". They started with a suit against Micro$oft who will probably do the heavy lifting and get it thrown out. (more)
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
q!Bang's blog reposted a nice story about high availability. Nice summary and well linked to quality resources. (more)
- OpenLDAP - four comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
This approach is oddly reminiscent of managing OpenLDAP's dynamic configuration backend with JXplorer, a general purpose LDAP browser. That's how we do a lot of things at Symas (gratuitous plug). (more)
- OpenLDAP - three comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Trey Drake of Sun (and assumedly of OpenDS) has posted a couple of articles on why LDAP is better than RDBMS systems for directory data. Here is the latest one (and the prior one). Good stuff.
For those who care, OpenLDAP introduced persistent search in its implementation of pull or sync replication (syncrepl) in OpenLDAP 2.2 a couple of years ago. We've considered surfacing it for enterprise use when customers have been curious but none have really pressed for the capability.
Yeah, Pat and Trey, let's keep an eye out for that first real DSML deployment
- OpenLDAP - three comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
With characteristic attention to detail and self-confidence, Howard Chu, Chief Architect of OpenLDAP, and Chief Architect of Symas, posted a summary of OpenLDAP 2.4.
The punch line:
I think it goes without saying that no other Directory Server in the world is this fast or this efficient. Couple that with the scalability, manageability, flexibility, and just the sheer know-how behind this software, and nothing else is even remotely comparable.(more)
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
As OpenLDAP 2.4 moves into its second Alpha release, people are starting to ask about Symas's plans to produce versions of Connexitor Directory Services (CDS) that are based on it, and what the effects will be on the current version of CDS, version 3. The short answer is that soon we will begin producing early versions of CDS version 4 that track OpenLDAP 2.4 as it moves from Alpha, to Beta, and into general release status. CDS version 3 will continue to be actively supported and maintained as long as our customers need it. The longer answer is as follows:
(more)- CDS - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Yet another howto and look at the OpenLDAP releases! 2.2! 2.4 is in Alpha and 2.3 has been out forever. Symas offers RPMs that should install 2.3 just as easily and you'll be getting the real thing with the real performance improvements, dynamic config over LDAP, and all the rest of the improvements. (more)
- OpenLDAP - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
A couple of blog entries from the OpenDS crowd. It's good to see Pat and the gang making progress and we love evangelizing LDAP. No matter who you work for or which LDAP software you're pushing, tell them the story! LDAP is the database that rocks for flexible hierarchic data and for Directories! Symas and OpenLDAP thank all who publicize LDAP.
(more)- OpenLDAP - eight comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
In The Register no less, great article that makes some points that are obvious to us at Symas. Founder driven software companies, like Symas, aren't under pressure from investors, can live up to their own expectations and visions, and can sustain strategies and roadmaps. Symas is in this businesses because we like being in it and because it offers us an opportunity to make a good living doing what we like. And we offer great products at very attractive prices. (more)
- Symas - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
People Just Another Weblog keep asking themselves whether to use OpenLDAP or Fedora Directory Services. Kostas makes the good point that Fedora seems to have a pretty small community. That's our perception as well. I hope he's following OpenLDAP's progress because it will become evident pretty fast that one is moving forward and the other is struggling for attention. Symas's CDS distribution of OpenLDAP is easy to drop into Fedora. No reason to fall all the way back to FDS.
(more)- OpenLDAP - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶